This page covers custom-written and home-made search engines. Of these
entries, only a few people were satisfied with their search engines.
Complaints include problems with coverage, duplicates, relevance ranking
and speed.
Given these problems, and the number of solid search engines available,
whether as commercial products, remote services or open-source code,
I recommend against custom search engines.
| rating |
how long |
date reported |
What works well about this search tool? |
Any problems or issues with this search tool? |
| 4 |
3 years |
01/2000 |
- |
- |
| 4 |
2 years |
01/2000 |
Searches all items coming up for
sale |
not really |
| 4 |
2 months |
02/2000 |
- |
- |
| 4 |
Don't know |
11/1999 |
Fast |
None |
| 3 |
5 years |
08/2001 |
- |
- |
| 3 |
5 years |
08/2000 |
Relevance ranking |
complex queries |
| 3 |
1 year |
06/2001 |
simple |
does not scan docs etc |
| 3 |
6 months |
10/2000 |
Gets the documents needed |
Does not support phonetics etc. |
| 3 |
3 months |
10/2000 |
all |
ok |
| 3 |
- |
10/2001 |
Fast |
No |
| 2 |
4 years |
01/1999 |
- |
speed (possibly due to hardware) |
| 2 |
3 years |
01/2002 |
Geared to products |
Not sufficiently accurate |
| 2 |
3 years |
01/1999 |
- |
- |
| 2 |
2 years |
06/1999 |
- |
- |
| 2 |
1.5 years |
01/2000 |
returns good set of results |
performance not quite as good as
needed |
| 2 |
1 year |
02/2002 |
fast; accurate; |
not able to index other file types
(Word, PPT, etc) |
| 2 |
1 year |
12/2000 |
- |
- |
| 2 |
9 months |
03/2001 |
accurate, several options, real-time |
too slow |
| 2 |
8 months |
02/2001 |
its an in-house tool built while
deciding what to select |
could be better |
| 2 |
6 months |
09/2001 |
fast |
doesn't find all content; no reports;
no customizable search results page (targeted ads, links to other
resources) |
| 2 |
6 months |
05/2000 |
easy to read results |
results not ranked by relevance |
| 2 |
6 months |
06/1999 |
Does a simple, keyword-based search. |
Users need a full-text search |
| 2 |
2 months |
03/2001 |
good keyword matching, ranking by
relevancy |
need natural language search, greater
scalability, faster search results |
| 2 |
1 month |
03/2001 |
search engine |
not effcient |
| 2 |
don't know |
09/1999 |
Gets the results |
Somebody installed the code, and
nobody here know how to modify it. Want a simpler search mechanism. |
| 2 |
- |
05/2002 |
- |
- |
| 2 |
25 years |
01/2001 |
fast |
compatibility with outside vendors |
| 1 |
3 years |
05/2002 |
it provides good results |
it is much too slow |
| 1 |
3 years |
04/2000 |
T |
It only performs top-level text searches |
| 1 |
2 years |
06/2001 |
Not a lot |
Difficult to find, hard to use, cannot
search the content of PDF documents |
| 1 |
2 years |
11/1999 |
- |
too limited, can not do multi-word
search |
| 1 |
2 years |
05/1999 |
- |
not specific in returning results;
no ability to do advanced searching or modify searches or refine
search within a returned set of search results |
| 1 |
14 months |
07/2001 |
- |
We have had many. At this time it
isn't working at all. We used this because at the time we were being
hosted and could not install any software. We are changing from
an NT server to and inhouse UNIX server and I need a search engine
that will work with this. |
| 1 |
1 year |
01/2001 |
it produces results |
not designed, sometimes no good relevance |
| 1 |
6 months |
06/2000 |
it index all site |
not accurate searches |
| 1 |
6 months |
03/2000 |
- |
- |
| 1 |
2 months |
01/2000 |
nothing |
too slow, does not find everything
it should, returns poor results |
| 1 |
2 weeks |
06/2000 |
- |
doesn't give an adequate order related
to relevance to the hits |
| 1 |
not yet |
06/2001 |
Integrated with TWiki |
Does not include: -proximity -phrases
-other |
| 1 |
not yet |
10/1999 |
it was ready on schedule. |
result format is minimal and erratic
too many duplicates finds pages it shouldn't |
| 1 |
don't know |
04/2002 |
- Not Applicable - |
It cannot index pdf, office files. |